Showing posts with label James Fenimore Cooper. Show all posts
Showing posts with label James Fenimore Cooper. Show all posts

Monday, March 23, 2020

UPDATED 3-24-2020! ‘TRAVELS WITH DARLEY’ HOST DARLEY NEWMAN, DVD REVIEWS, ‘THE PATHFINDER’ AND ‘THE SONG OF HIAWATHA’, PLUS TCM ANNOUNCES FEST HOME EDITION!



HENRY’S WESTERN ROUND-UP RETURNS TO WEEKLY SCHEDULE!

Greetings from Quarantine, Rounders!


As I commence – or actually continue – the second decade of The Round-up, I have decided to return to posting every Sunday. As those of you who have been with The Round-up since the beginning will remember, The Round-up was a regular Sunday-night event – actually more like a Monday at 3 a.m. event. It gradually changed to a monthly-ish deal because of the success The Round-up brought me: I was honored to be hired as the Western Film and TV Editor of True West Magazine. I began reading True West when I was ten years old. The magazine was a rare sight in my Brooklyn neighborhood, but whenever my family would travel West for vacations – my parents loved long-drive vacations – I would snap up copies wherever I could find them.

Of course, my monthly duties for True West, in addition to teaching full-time, took a toll on the time I could spend on The Round-up. Well, with all of the bad news we are currently sharing, one surprise consequence for me is that, at least for the rest of the school year, I am not currently a full-time teacher. I plan to use some of that extra time to finish a book, and a screenplay that should have taken me three months, but has taken over a year. Maybe two years. And at least for the time being, I’m going to post The Round-up every Sunday night. It’s going to be a bit shorter than it has been of late, because as we all know, at the moment there is no scripted film or TV production going on. But there are completed shows and films in the pipeline, and there are filmmakers who, like all of us, are sitting around at home, that I can talk to. I will feature at least one review of a new or recent home video release every week: we all need new things to watch. I also hope to make book reviews a more regular event.

I’m starting this new Round-up with an interview with Darley Newman, host of Travels with Darley, a fascinating world travel series found on many PBS stations, here in L.A. on KCET, and on Amazon as well. I know none of us are going anywhere right now, but we will soon, and Darley has some wonderful ideas for places to visit. Things will get better!

TRAVELS WITH DARLEY – A Chat with TV Travel Host Darley Newman



Darley Newman has been traveling the United States, and the world, since 2016, creating and hosting her show, Travels with Darley. In each 30-minute episode – half of them in the United States and half around the world – she tracks down locals to advise her. “The idea for this show is to travel with locals as your guides. Actually, Travel Like a Local was the original name.”  Athletic and adventurous, Darley’s show focuses on local history and food and drink, but also hiking, biking, horseback riding, bungee jumping, swimming with sharks, and the occasional need to put distance between Darley and an enraged elephant.  It’s not an idea that came to Darley overnight.  “I wanted to do this since high school. I said, I'm going to host a travel show one day and didn't know how to exactly do that, but I'm pretty creative. So I came up with a way. And I love doing it for Public Television because nobody dictates the content. I love that because you can still tell really good stories, and you can get in depth, which is harder to find in the media nowadays.”

We had a chance to meet and talk recently, when she came to Los Angeles, to celebrate the arrival of Travels with Darley at KCET. It’s currently seen on 96% of PBS stations, and available on Amazon.  She first became interested in travel due to a sad circumstance.

DARLEY: I grew up in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The first big trip I took was when I was five or six, and I came out to California. My grandfather passed away, he got cremated, and we came out to spread his ashes in different areas that he felt strongly about. We did one in the San Francisco area.  We went to Chinatown one night, over by the Golden Gate Bridge. I remember falling asleep in a restaurant in Chinatown, under the table, because I was so tired. But it was neat. I mean, I've got this love to travel. I love the adventure of it; I look at every day as an adventure.

HENRY: Tell me about your first travel series.

DARLEY: I started doing this show called Equitrekking many years ago. The idea was to go horseback riding around the world with locals as your guides, which sounds bizarre, but it's been really successful. Because you get into a lot of natural areas, and see things that people don't normally get to experience or film. I did everything; going to Botswana, Africa and doing a safari on horseback, where I got charged by an elephant.

HENRY: What exotic places have you visited on Travels with Darley?

DARLEY: I've ridden with the Bedouin in Jordan. I've snowmobiled across glaciers in Iceland, I just jumped off the Macau Tower in Macau, China and filmed it in 360 and survived.

HENRY: Anything unusual a little closer to home?


Darley at Theodore Roosevelt Park in North Dakota


DARLEY: I just did North Dakota this past year, which I thought was fascinating. And I didn't know anyone else who's filmed there. I looked up travel content and couldn't find anything done on the areas where we ended up going. We discovered such interesting things; you can hike to ice caves in the summer and cool off in the grasslands, which is kind of interesting. There's really fascinating Native American culture there, and tribes that I'd never heard of, which we all should learn about.

HENRY: North Dakota is perfect for my readership, because their main interest is the American West. Any other episodes that would be of particular interest to them?

DARLEY: Oh, tons. I just did this new season. We did Tahoe and Reno – Reno I thought was really interesting and underrated, really awesome art scene. There’re just murals all over town, I love when there's street art and murals. I think it makes something different for people to just enjoy things out in the public, public art. Then there's railroad history. I did a segment on the Transcontinental Railroad that's in the show. In Wyoming I did a whole thing on the history of ranches. Went to a hundred-year-old-ranch in Wyoming. I love going to ranches because again, there's not as many. There are dude ranches out there, but there's not as many that are getting preserved there. We're losing some still. The people that run ranches, they've chosen this lifestyle; they're fascinating to talk with or hang out with. And that goes for like so many businesses. Because if you choose to do what you love, wow, what freedom there is with that.



HENRY: Are you doing any riding in the current series?

DARLEY: It's funny, when I first started Travels with Darley, I was like, I'm not going to do any riding, because I'm going to try to differentiate the series. But I'm in the first season, in Maryland, eastern shore. I went to Assateague Island, and they've got wild horses there so I have to cover it, right?  I ended up doing a fair number with horses.  I just filmed in Qatar. We're going to release this winter (note: it’s a available now) and I actually got to saddle up there, and ride at a lot of those stables, and they’ve got a lot of the prize race horses there. But then you could also go and take a riding lesson. It was really hot.

HENRY: How hot?

DARLEY: Like 110.

HENRY: That's hot.

DARLEY: And humid. I was surprised.

HENRY:  What is the first thing you do when you're visiting a new place?

DARLEY: I always walk around. It's nice to explore somewhere on foot, just kind of weaving through a place, not necessarily having a set agenda, to see what you can stumble upon, as long as you're safe about it. I love it in Seville, Spain, one of my favorite places, because you can just wind through their public streets forever, and just get lost, and see so much as you do so.



HENRY: How is Travels with Darley different from other travel shows?

DARLEY: Everything that I have done in all of these episodes, they're all things that anybody can go and do. I didn't get exclusive access; they're open to the public. So you can either just watch it, and feel like you've traveled, or you can really actually do it, which is nice. We're trying to cover a lot of U.S. places, because there aren't as many shows that are doing that, and there's just so much that we have in the U.S. to experience; things people don't know about.

HENRY: How big an operation are you?

DARLEY: When we're filming, there's four of us in total. That includes me. We're a small team. I hear about other shows, and they're like half a dozen, dozen people on them. and I'm like, what do they all do? I edited every single episode up to this last season. You don't need a huge team now with all the modern technology. And since I started doing it, things have just gotten easier, year upon year, and I think it's really exciting.

‘THE PATHFINDER’ & ‘THE SONG OF HIAWATHA’ – SPLIT DECISION
A DVD REVIEW



The tremendous success of 1992’s LAST OF THE MOHICANS, with which Director Michael Mann made an international star of Daniel Day Lewis, led to a rise in Indian-centered Westerns, and a revived interest in the writings of MOHICANS author James Fenimore Cooper. The two films presented in this double-feature from Mill Creek Entertainment, 1996’s THE PATHFINDER, based on Cooper’s 1840 novel, continuing the MOHICANS story, and 1997’s THE SONG OF HIAWATHA, from Henry Wadsworth Longfellow’s 1855 epic poem, were a direct result. Produced back to back for Hallmark Entertainment, they are clearly of the same world, yet are remarkably different.

Both films were shot in the beautiful green wilds of Ontario, Canada, and both feature MOHICANS star Russell Means, and fine fellow Native actor Graham Greene. PATHFINDER is shot competently, if without inspiration, with good costuming. There are some splendid sailing ships, and the most exciting sequence is a well-done storm at sea that threatens to destroy the ship. But while there are some good performances – Charles Edward Powell as a traitorous English officer, female lead and later THE MAGNIFICENT SEVEN series star Laurie Holden, many performances are weak, and Kevin Dillon has the thankless job of following Daniel Day Lewis in a terribly underwritten role, coming off as the great stone face. Even Jaimz Woolvett, who was so memorable as The Schofield Kid in UNFORGIVEN, is woefully miscast here as a ship’s captain.  Stacy Keach has a nice cameo as a French politician. I was recently interviewing him about his Westerns. When I asked him about PATHFINDER, he said, “Oh my, yes. I went up (to Canada) for a day to shoot that thing.” When I confessed that, at the time, I hadn’t seen it, he laughed, “Nor have I.”

THE SONG OF HIAWATHA, on the other hand, is awfully good, and largely unknown. In addition to Means and Greene – who do far better work here – the excellent Indigenous cast includes Gordon Tootoosis, Adam Beach, beautiful Irene Bedard as Minnehaha, and as Hiawatha, Litefoot, who played the title character in THE INDIAN IN THE CUPBOARD, and has the distinction of being the first successful Native American rapper. Among the talented non-Native cast members are Michael Rooker and David Stratairn.

Screenwriter Earl W. Wallace had a long career in television, including GUNSMOKE episodes and movies, and shared on Oscar for WITNESS. Remarkably, director Jeffrey Shore has no other directing credits. The double feature is available from Mill Creek Entertainment, for $9.98, HERE.

UPDATE 3-24-2020 – TCM ANNOUNCES CLASSIC FILM FESTIVAL HOME EDITION!


It was no surprise, but a big disappointment, when TCM cancelled it’s TCM CLASSIC FILM FESTIVAL: after all, everything is cancelled until further notice. But those clever characters at TCM have decided that the original dates for the event, April 16th through the 19th, will be the first ever HOME EDITION version of the classic event, featuring movies that have been presented at the Fest in the past, and ones that would have been presented this year. Also, interviews and events that were filmed at previous TCM Fests will be featured, including Luise Rainer (2011), Eva Marie Saint (2014), Kim Novak (2013), Faye Dunaway (2017), Norman Lloyd (2016), and Peter O’Toole (2012). The announcement adds, this special edition of the Fest begins April 16 at 8pm (ET), continuing until April 19 on TCM and will include TCM hosts, special guests and events to follow on-air and online. 

AND THAT’S A WRAP!



And I’ll be back next Sunday with more! In the meantime, please check out the April True West Magazine, on newsstands now, featuring my article on the 40th anniversary of the release of THE LONG RIDERS. In writing the article I had the pleasure of interviewing stars and producers and brothers James Keach (Jesse James) and Stacy Keach (Frank James), Robert Carradine (Bob Younger), Pamela Reed (Belle Starr) and director Walter Hill!

Happy Trails,

Henry

All Original Contents Copyright March, 2020 by Henry C. Parke – All Rights Reserved


Sunday, September 1, 2013

MCQUEEN’S BACK, ‘DEAD OR ALIVE’ ON ME-TV, plus COMIC WESTERN ‘QUICKDRAW’ NEW ON HULU!



UPDATED 9/4/2013 – See change of date on ‘AROUND THE BARN’ story.

UPDATED 9/2/13 11:08 A.M.

Labor Day triggers a new schedule for the Me-TV network – and they’re bringing back Steve McQueen in his star-making role of bounty hunter Josh Randall in WANTED: DEAD OR ALIVE.  A series not seen on television for many years, McQueen did 94 episodes from 1958 to 1961, and in my humble opinion it was one of the great half-hour westerns, right up there with HAVE GUN WILL TRAVEL, THE REBEL, THE RIFLEMAN, and the first six years of GUNSMOKE.  It’ll play weekdays at 5 am, and Saturdays at 4 pm. 

F-TROOP, the delightful western comedy series, will play Monday through Thursday nights at 9:30 pm.  It stars Forrest Tucker as Sgt. O’Rourke, and Larry Storch – soon to be seen in the new Western feature KNIGHT OF THE GUN – as Cpl. Agarn, playing a pair of lovable Bilko-like old west connivers, with Ken Berry as the well-meaning but clueless Captain Parmenter, their hapless foil, and beautiful, feisty Melody Patterson – jail bait at the time! – as Wrangler Jane.  Also standouts in the cast are James Hampton as Dobbs, Frank DeKova as Chief Wild Eagle, Don Diamond as Crazy Cat, and in a tremendous break from his B-western heroics, Bob Steele in a terrific comic turn as Duffy.


WAGON TRAIN will continue Saturdays, but at 11:30 am; RAWHIDE will be seen Saturdays at 3 pm; THE RIFLEMAN continues with its hour block weeknights at 6 pm, plus Saturdays at 5 pm; and DANIEL BOONE will continue weekdays at 9 am.  


‘QUICKDRAW’ – a TV Review



The folks at HULU have been making new and old movies and TV shows available online for a few years, but only recently decided to produce their own exclusive content.  I got word in February that they were set to make a western comedy series, QUICKDRAW.  The show stars John Lehr, who toplined the series 10 ITEMS OR LESS, but is perhaps most familiar as one of the resentful cavemen in the very dry and funny series of GEICO INSURANCE commercials.   He and Nancy Hower created QUICKDRAW; they write it together, and she directs. 

Under considerable secrecy their company took over Paramount Ranch in Agoura for the month of March, and shot a season of eight half-hour (okay, 23 minutes) episodes.  I so wanted to see what was going on that, when they wouldn’t permit press, I tried to get on as an extra, but they were a SAG show, so that didn’t work either.  Well, with virtually no fanfare, the shows have been completed, and the first five episodes are available for free right now online – here’s the link to episode 1 on HULU:   http://www.hulu.com/#!watch/511696#i0,p0,d0



John Lehr plays lawman John Henry Hoyle, newly appointed sheriff in a town where you can place a bet at the local saloon on the time and day that the new sheriff will die.  Sheriff Hoyle, unlike his predecessors, is a Harvard man, and absolutely full of himself, convinced that, being an educated man, he knows more about everything – include subjects he knows nothing about -- than any of the simple dolts in town.  In truth, he is a horse’s ass, although good with a gun.  He is assisted by Deputy Eli Brocius (Nick Brown), who is also not that bright, but not self-deluded.  (Whenever Oliver Hardy, the fat one of Laurel and Hardy, was asked whose character was dumber, he always said his own.  He reasoned that Stan was dumb, and knew it.  Ollie was dumb, and thought he was smart, which made him really dumb.)  In fact, every man in the show is a dimwit, and every woman is smart, sassy, sexy, and a whore.  This is a PC updating of the old burlesque tradition where the men were dumb but sly, and all the women were sexy, but dumber than the men. 

In tone, QUICKDRAW is BLAZING SADDLES meets ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT.  It’s vulgar like BLAZING SADDLES, but played largely straight-faced like ARRESTED DEVELOPMENT, and a lot of the humor comes from having very modern-seeming characters, especially Hoyle, in a period situation where, in reality, they wouldn’t survive long.  Surprisingly, while the show has no intention of being ‘good history,’ there is an obvious awareness of history in the setting up of gags.   Cole Younger, Belle Starr, Pearl Starr, and the Bender family all turn up, as do small-pox-infested Army blankets. 

The production makes optimum use of the Paramount Ranch facilities, and costume and art direction credits are admirable.  There is a bit of riding and frequent gunplay, the latter not surprisingly played for laughs. 
One of the stand-outs in the supporting cast is Bob Clendenin as Vernon Shank, the undertaker; his bald pate and long, sorrowful face are as familiar from neo-noirs like L.A. CONFIDENTIAL and THE 13TH FLOOR as they are from comedies.  Also notable are Allison Dunbar as a whore and saloon-keeper named Honey, and Alexis Dox as Pearl. 

A couple of years ago, when the success of the 3:10 TO YUMA and TRUE GRIT remakes brought heat to the Western genre, every network had at least one series in development, and at least two proposed drama series dealt with an educated easterner going west to apply modern scientific methods to crime investigation.  I’d be willing to bet the creators of QUICKDRAW saw the obvious humorous possibilities in the premise, and accidentally had their parody beat the dramas to the marketplace. 



I wouldn’t recommend showing this ‘DIRTY F-TROOP’ to kids, as the language tends to be, perhaps in a nod to DEADWOOD, but more likely as an easy laugh, peppered with not four-letter words, but the occasional ‘vagina,’ ‘testicle’ and ‘intercourse.’  And the visuals often go for shock-value; one episode opens with a stage-coach riding into town driven by a decapitated driver, the coach full of corpses that are later handled without a modicum of respect. 

The show is a continuing saga, so it makes sense to watch it from the beginning.  I’ve seen the first three episodes, and I plan to watch the whole season.  My biggest reservation with the show is also my most basic.  While I found many things to amuse me, moments to smile about, I don’t know that I laughed out loud even once. 


R.I.P.D. ARRIVES D.O.A.

The Round-up had been following this comic-book adaptation ever since it was announced a couple of years ago.  Granted, a sci-fier about dead cops tracking dead criminals for the Rest In Peace Department isn’t exactly a natural for the Round-up.  But I figured with Jeff Bridges playing a long dead old-west lawman, partnered with newly dead partner Ryan Reynolds, it would be of interest to Western fans. 

I was a little annoyed when all of my requests for a screener copy, or admission to a press preview, were ignored.  Then I found out there were no screeners or previews, and I understood it was nothing personal.  Then last night I caught the film at a ‘dollar’ theatre, and I understood completely.  The filmmakers had nothing to gain by letting the press get an early peek.



R. I. P. D. is sewn together from stolen parts in much the same way Frankenstein’s monster was.   If you remove the elements jacked from GHOSTBUSTERS, GHOST and the MEN IN BLACK films, what you have left is…Jeff Bridges.  And typically, the filmmakers don’t understand the films they steal from.  (‘GHOST’ spoiler alert!)  It took a long time, and was a helluvah shock, to realize that Tony Goldwyn was the villain of the piece; but Kevin Bacon, playing that role in R.I.P.D., is revealed in the first few minutes, and as a result has virtually nothing to do for the rest of the film except cackle with glee. 

In a nutshell, Ryan Reynolds is an almost-clean Boston cop who, with partner Kevin Bacon, stole a big gold whatsit from some meth dealers they were busting.  Reynolds feels guilty, wants to turn it in, hence Bacon can’t afford to let him live.   The whatsit turns out to have much greater significance than its monetary value, and saying more would give away what painfully little non-obvious plot there is.

Some of the technical credits are very good.  The art direction goes from the so-so to the occasionally stunning – a tornado of souls traveling to and from the other side is particularly memorable.  The endless effects are competent, and some of the chase stuff at the end is very exciting, except that by that point you’re looking more closely at your watch than the screen.  And the design of the creatures is so obviously copied from the previously sited films that it’s embarrassing.

While Jeff Bridges is amusing in his swagger, and particularly enjoyable in his by-play with Mary Louise Parker as a emotionless and hyper-competent office-runner who regrets their dalliance, there is little sense of chemistry between Bridges and Reynolds.  For me, the most pleasant surprise was the simple sincerity of Reynolds’ performance.  Whenever he played to the pain of the cop who had lost the love of his life (Stephanie Szostack), all the crap fell away, and for all-too-brief moments the story became utterly believable. 


‘ROUND-UP’ ON THE AIR AND ‘AROUND THE BARN’ ON SAT. DEC 14TH!

Bobbi Jean with her commendation from the L.A. County
Board of Supervisors


(Please note:  I would not normally plug my radio appearance three months in advance.  It was originally scheduled for this coming Saturday, but we were just preempted by a Dodger baseball game.  Go Dodger Blue (I guess)!

On Saturday, December 14th, I will be a guest of Bobbi Jean Bell on her Saturday morning show on  KHTS AM 1220, ‘Around The Barn.’  Heard every Saturday from 9 to 10 a.m., hosts Bobbi Jean Bell and Julie Fox Pomilia discuss western culture, music and lifestyle.  Bobbi Jean is the lady behind the Outwest Western Boutique and Cultural Center in Santa Clarita:
http://www.outwestmktg.com/  But don't wait until December -- you can hear the program live every Saturday (except September 7th) by clicking the following link, and clicking on ‘Listen Live.’  http://hometownstation.com/content/saturday-program-schedule


‘RAMONA DAY(S)’ SATURDAY, SEPT. 7TH!




I had a great time last year attending RAMONA DAYS, at Piru, the home of Rancho Camulos, also known as The Home of Ramona.   The del Valle family received is as a huge land- grant (48,612 acres!) from the government of Mexico in 1839; it achieved international fame when author Helen Hunt Jackson visited in 1882, and decided to set her novel, RAMONA, there.  (You can read my detailed description of my visit HERE . )

I understand that this year’s celebration will feature the Ramona Pageant Players and Dancers, Flamenco dancers, historical re-enactors, tours of the beautiful grounds and gardens, and the historic 1853 adobe, special children's activities, food, specialty vendors, and an exciting raffle with great prizes. Advance tickets are now on sale for only $7 per adult ($10 at the gate). Children are free. To learn more, and to purchase tickets, go here: http://events.r20.constantcontact.com/register/event?oeidk=a07e7zw7m3k37d4d78c&llr=nvg6ppmab



THE CONTINUING SAGA OF JAMES FENIMORE COOPER’S HOME AND PLAQUE!

The onetime address of James Fenimore Cooper, a
gay steam-bath, and a video store.  Col. Hamilton's
home is on the right.


What an interesting can of worms I opened up!  As regular readers know, when I was back in New York City a couple of weeks ago, I hiked with fellow NYU alum and Round-up contributor Jonathan Boorstein over to St. Marks Place, an old block on the Lower East Side.  In our college days we would often walk past a building, The St. Marks Baths, which a plaque announced had been the home of Leatherstocking Tales author James Fenimore Cooper; I thought I’d snap a picture of the building and plaque for the Round-up.   

We trudged up and down the two-block length of St. Marks Place, but never found the plaque.  I snapped a picture of what I thought to be the right building, at 4 St. Marks.  I’d sent an inquiry to the folks at the James Fenimore Cooper Society, about the address and the plaque, and received a response from Hugh MacDougall, Corresponding Secretary:

“You are quite correct. Cooper lived at 4 St. Marks Place (pictured in your attachment) for a time after his return from Europe in 1833. Specifically, he lived there from May 1, 1834 until May 1, 1836 (May 1 was the standard period for leases in New York to begin and end). He, and sometimes his family also, made a number of trips to Cooperstown during that period, as he arranged to buy back and remodel his old family home (Otsego Hall) originally built about 1800 by his father William Cooper.”  He also included a photograph of the house from Mary Phillips’ 1913 biography, JAMES FENIMORE COOPER.  “It is clearly the one you photographed.”  (Click HERE to see the photos and article from last week’s Round-up. )

I pressed him for information on the plaque, and heard back from Mr. MacDougall with details about the building’s history.   The entire block of St. Marks Place between 2nd and 3rd Avenues was built by English-born real estate developer Thomas E. Davis in the 1830s.  The house at 4 St. Marks is known as the Hamilton-Holly House as it was bought in 1833 by Colonel Alexander Hamilton, son of the former Secretary of the Treasury, who had been killed in a duel with Vice President Aaron Burr.  It was a very elegant block of one-family homes, but had become run-down, and most of the grand homes had become boarding-houses by the time of the Civil War (you know a house is old when you talk about the neighborhood going bad in the 1860s).

Mr. MacDougall told me that he’d passed my inquiry about the plaque to the New York Historical Society.   A couple of days later I received a startling update: we were looking at the wrong building!  The house pictured in a century-old photograph and described in the Cooper biography, described in numerous historical texts, and by myself, the Hamilton-Holly is next door to Cooper’s home!  The correct address is 6 St. Marks Place.  Mr. MacDougall forwarded the letter from Joseph Ditta, Reference Librarian of the NYHS, to me.  It contains several links to documents and articles.  One, by Jeff Weinstein for his Out There blog in 2008, detailed that until fairly recently, 6 St. Marks had been the home of Kim’s Video, a vast and fabled New York video store that catered to knowledgeable and voracious movie-lovers much as Eddie Brandt’s Saturday Matinee does to West-coasters to this day.  “Kim branches opened and closed, but the move to a spacious site at 6 St. Marks Place allowed the addition of CDs and digital paraphernalia. But only the videos drew me and other addicts into the moldy elevator week after week. The building had before housed the New St. Marks Baths, a gay-sex meeting place shuttered because of AIDS (a complex story in itself), and a semigay Turkish bath before that. Mr. Kim had plenty of cleaning to do — not all of it completed, as far as I could tell. I also recall a plaque on the old building: ‘On this site stood the winter residence from 1834-1836 and the last New York City home of the novelist James Fenimore Cooper.’”  You could in fact rent LAST OF THE MOHICANS in the former home of its author. 

Well, that answers that.  And I am grateful to The James Fenimore Cooper Society, and The New York Historical Society, and Jeff Weinstein, for setting the matter straight.  Now if we could only get the plaque put back up!  And one more postscript.  I also asked Mr. MacDougall how far west Cooper, whose western tales were often set farther east than later writers, had travelled.  “The farthest west Cooper ever traveled in America was Kalamazoo, Michigan and its area – which he visited several times towards the end of his life because of some property he had acquired there, and (as was often the case) made use of the occasion to scout out the background for a novel (The Oak Openings, or The Bee Hunter, published in 1848, and the last of his “Indian” tales).

THE WRAP-UP

That's it for this week -- hope you're having a great Labor Day Weekend!  I know -- here's a salute to both the Jerry Lewis MD Telethon, and the King of the Cowboys!



Happy trails!

Henry

All Original Content Copyright September 2013 by Henry C. Parke -- All Rights Reserved


Monday, August 26, 2013

‘YELLOW ROCK’ COMPOSER RANDY MILLER ON SCORING FOR WESTERNS




The Western movie YELLOW ROCK has won international awards, national awards, film festivals, awards from cowboy organizations and awards from Indian organizations (you can read my review HERE if you missed it).

Starring Michael Biehn, James Russo and Lenore Andriel, directed by Nick Vallelonga, co-written and co-produced by Lenore Andriel and Steve Doucette, the making of this small but powerful movie should be an inspiration for anyone trying against all odds to get a film made.  It’s also a damned good movie, and thought-provoking.  Recently, composer Randy Miller’s   score, by turns beautiful, haunting and relentless, was released on CD by Intrada.  It’s a worthy addition to your western soundtrack collection, as you’ll hear from the audio clips you’ll find at the end of this article. 

I recently had the pleasure of talking in-depth to Randy Miller about YELLOW ROCK, his other soundtracks, his favorite composers and scores and, perhaps most enlightening, the nuts and bolts of how motion picture scores, big-budget and small, are created. 

HENRY PARKE: Many times I’ve been in a cutting room, looking at dailies or a rough-cut, and everything looks stilted and hollow, and you think, this is not a movie.  This is obvious actors speaking lines.  Then you put a temporary piece of music behind it, and it suddenly comes to life, and you think, “Oh my God, it is a movie!”  What is it that music brings to film, that makes such a difference?

Randy Miller conducting during the recording of
the 'CONTAGION' score


RANDY MILLER:  That’s a good question.  And that music – by the way, we call it ‘temp’ music – is really important.  This is not the answer to your question, but I’ll get to that.  The temp music is probably the last creative element that’s brought to a movie.  The story’s been written, the actors have acted, the editing’s underway.  But a whole new element is created, and that’s the score.  And that brings so much; it can bring something that’s not at all on the screen.  For example, there might be a scene where it’s very quiet, it might be just the peaceful forest.  But if you put in threatening music, then something scary’s in the forest.  That’s bringing something that doesn’t even exist into the scene.  That would be one extreme; the other extreme would be giving exactly what you see, just highlighting it.  Give you an example; in YELLOW ROCK, there were wolves.  You see the wolves, and if you bring threatening music along with the wolf, it’s going to heighten the feeling that’s there.  And the other thing you can do would be where you intentionally do the opposite, for comedy.  For example, you have a comedic scene, and you play serious music against it; it’s the opposite of what you see, but it becomes funny.  It’s a contrasting.  The music coming in at the end, by the composer, gives the director a whole other ‘color’ to work with, along with the dialogue and sound effects; it’s a whole ‘nother sort of  palette to bring to the film.  And it’s huge, as you know.

HENRY: At what age did you become interested in music? 

RANDY: I started piano lessons around 8 or 9, and played through high school; picked up clarinet somewhere in junior high, 6 or 7th grade.  My mom was a professional singer, so I was always around it, and she was always performing different places up in the Catskill Mountains of New York.

HENRY:  What kind of music did she sing?

RANDY: She did show music; semi-legit Broadway.  Mostly show songs, but some opera, some operetta.  And when she settled down to have a family, she still worked.  She worked all over the country when she was younger.  But when she settled down in upstate New York, she worked in the hotels around the area.  So I was always around that, and at some point in my early twenties I actually started accompanying her.  I went to music school when I was 18; I went to Berkeley Music School in Boston.  At that time I was more interested in theatre music, Broadway music, as an orchestrator.

HENRY: So you’re an East-coaster like myself.

RANDY: Yuh, I’m from Ellenville, New York, near the Catskills.  It’s an hour and a half from New York City, near Kingston and Woodstock and all that.  I have a degree in composition from Berkeley.  Then I started arranging some show-things, but I got into more contemporary arranging for records, and a little bit of film work.  I was working on a record in Miami,  as the string arranger and conductor; then I came out here.  I had the opportunity to do some work in the film end of things, and I ended up moving here (to Los Angeles). 

HENRY:  So you weren’t planning initially to be a film composer.

RANDY:  No, I wanted to be an arranger for Broadway. 

HENRY:  Is that something you’d still like to do?

RANDY:  I have had a chance to do it, which has been fun.  Occasionally projects come by that are based on the Broadway tradition, and every chance I get to do it, it’s just a lot of fun.  It’s very limited; if that’s all you do, you really have to be in New York, fight your way into the inner core of that stuff.  I never tried to do that.  I got involved with film music, I stayed with it, and I’m glad I did.  Once in a while I do get to do that kind of (Broadway) stuff, and it’s always a blast. 

HENRY: What were big musical influences on you as a young guy?  Whose music impressed you?

RANDY:  When I was probably nineteen, The Rite of Spring, by Stravinsky.   I remember putting headphones on, and listening to that, and going, “I have no idea what I’m listening to.”  I have no idea how Stravinsky composed that.  I don’t understand it, but it’s just unbelievable, amazing music.  

HENRY:  It caused riots when it was originally performed.

RANDY: It did; and as you know, this is the centennial, this year.  It was a hundred years ago this spring when it was performed in Paris.  There are a lot of performances all over the country right now, because of that.  The Rite of Spring had a big effect on me.  Actually, a couple of years before, I went with my mother and father to see a revival of THE KING AND I on Broadway.  Yul Brynner was in it, and most of the people (from the original cast) were in it, although they were quite a bit older than when they first did it.  And that really hit me; that was amazing.  I was listening to my hero back then, who was Robert Russell Benet, an orchestrator for all of Rogers and Hammerstein and many other people, and I got really interested in what he was doing.  The music of THE KING AND I is still among my favorites, probably because it imprinted such a strong impression on me, what he was doing as an orchestrator of Richard Rogers’ music.  The simple themes of the songs that he turned into this beautiful score.   When I was a real kid, from ten to eighteen, I was mostly into show songs, with my mother playing these things.  I wasn’t that much into it until I went down to Broadway.  But I was listening to the contemporary rock of the day, a little jazz.  But it really didn’t hit me until those two events guided me.  I’m trying to think what film music influenced me – you were mentioning DR. NO[1], which of course had the James Bond Theme, that great theme.  I guess it would be John Williams and Jerry Goldsmith.  Those two guys in the ‘70s and ‘80s just made so much great music.  PLANET OF THE APES for Goldsmith, and then STAR TREK; and for Williams, everything – STAR WARS and JAWS.  So once I started hearing that stuff, that was something I got really interested in, even though I understood when I heard those things, what they were and how to do it.  I’m not saying I could do it, but I understood it, where with Stravinsky I couldn’t understand what he was doing, and it took music school for me to figure it out, from a compositional point of view.

HENRY:   That’s interesting.  It’s sort of like, as a writer, you read novels, and you can follow what’s going on.  And then you read Hemingway, and suddenly it’s like you’re starting from page one all over again. 

RANDY:  Yeah, it’s the best!  Even to this day, when I hear things that I don’t understand, how is this composer doing this, that’s the most interesting stuff.  Even if it’s not sophisticated, difficult music.  It could be just a rap guy that’s doing really cool rhythms; whatever it is, when it’s something that I don’t really know how to do, that’s the kind of thing that kind of draws me to try and understand it.  

HENRY:  What was the first film or TV project that you composed for?

RANDY:  I did a lot of student films in Boston, at Berkley, but when I came out here on that CD project, as a string arranger, I ended up going to school at SC for graduate studies in film scoring, so at that point I started doing a lot of student films at USC, UCLA, and AFI.  I learned a lot there, but as important, I met filmmakers, and I’m still doing things for a few of them; a few of them have had real careers, and I’m happy to have met them at that period.  I met a French horn player on a student film, and she was working for a big Hollywood composer named Robert Folk at the time.  She hired me as a courier to bring him some CDs and things.  I only worked for her for one day, because I went to his house, and it was such great timing.  He happened to be working on a film, and he needed someone to do some pop music, and he hired me that day to work on the film, CAN’T BUY ME LOVE.  That was the first time.  I was doing ‘source music’, which means it’s coming from an (on-screen) source, like a radio, TV, CD-player.  That was a fairly big studio film, so that was a great experience, even though it was source music.  I think the first time I did my own score, not working for someone else, was probably a horror film – THE BOY FROM HELL or DR. HACKENSTEIN or WITCHCRAFT (laughs), they were all from 1988.  I think THE BOY FROM HELL was the first.  It was a low-budget horror film that had a satanic edge to it.   Not much money, but it was great, to get your own project, and be the person responsible for all of it.  I had some experience at that point working for Robert Folk and other composers, so I was coming in prepared.  But very little money and very little time, and unfortunately it wasn’t a great film, but I always do the best I can with the music, and that’s an interesting thing, because you can do your best, no matter what; even if the film is not a great film, you can still turn in your best effort. 

HENRY:  And you can certainly take a film that is not ideal, and improve it tremendously with the music.  Especially genre stuff; horror and noir things, what you can do with the suspense and tone.

RANDY: Absolutely.  You’re absolutely right.  And what we were saying before, that the music comes so late in the process, and it really can make a difference.  With YELLOW ROCK, which is a good film, but an underfunded film – they didn’t have a lot of money to work with.  Steve Doucette and Lenore Andriel really stepped up to the plate, as they say, and funded the music much more than you would expect from the small budget that they had.  Because they agreed with me that the film was really great, and could be that much better if we had the resources to record a score that sounded theatrical, instead of a score that might be okay on TV, but wouldn’t really play in movie theatres.  I think that was a great example of them agreeing that music could really elevate the film.  And in a relatively inexpensive way.  When you think about it, you can bring in some more name actors, that’s going to help sell a film of course, hopefully they do great performances; but the cost of the score isn’t that much when you look at all the other elements of filmmaking.        

HENRY:  How did you get involved with YELLOW ROCK?

RANDY:  Lenore and I met through a mutual friend who lived where we live in Old Topanga, maybe ten years ago.  Lenore had written a couple of scripts, not YELLOW ROCK, and was actively trying to get the films made.  She ended up getting this one made, and I think she wrote the script fairly quickly.  When she got this one underway, she called me, because we had talked about doing something together, and asked if I wanted to do it, and I said, “Yes, sounds great!”  I mean, to combine Westerns and Native Americans and the supernatural, all these things – it’s a great project to work on.  And that’s how it started.  She had something of a rough assembly (a rough-cut); she sent it over, and we started working together. 

HENRY: I was wondering if YELLOW ROCK is your first western score.  You scored PIRATES OF THE PRAIRIE – is that a western? 

RANDY:  It’s not, but it had western elements.  It’s a pirate movie, but due to an unusual twist in the story, it ends up in Nebraska. So there was western music in there, quite a bit, even though it was a comedy really, an action comedy for kids.  There was western music in AMARAGOSA, which was a beautiful documentary that takes place in the Mojave Desert.  DREAM RIDER had some western music in it because it took place in Colorado.  But this is the first full-on western I’ve ever done. Maybe I’m wrong about this, but hasn’t there been a resurgence of westerns in the last five or six years?

HENRY:  I certainly think so.   Of course I’m so focused on it that it’s a little hard to judge.  But I do think there really is resurgence.   And there’s a huge loyalty; there are many people who are terribly eager for the next western project, which is very encouraging as I keep trying to write it.  (laughs)

RANDY:  When TRUE GRIT came out a couple of years ago, and 3:10 TO YUMA, it seemed like a couple of them in a row; I don’t think Lenore did hers thinking about this at all.  I think it’s just the way it happened.  I didn’t really expect to do a western because there weren’t really that many of them for the last ten or fifteen years.  And then good luck came my way, and I got a chance to work on one.  It’s a pleasure.

HENRY:  While I’m a very big fan of movie music, I don’t know much about the process.  So you were sent a rough cut, and what do you do then?  How do you approach it?  Do the filmmakers tell you what they want, or do you tell them what they need? 

RANDY:  All of those.  We mentioned temporary music.  The temp score; in the case of YELLOW ROCK, the film came in with some music placed in some scenes, and not in others, where we all though there needed to be music.  So the rough cut comes in.  When you’re sitting down with the producer or the director, you’re discussing the music as it relates to the film, and the temporary music is very useful, even if it’s wrong.  If the music doesn’t fit, it’s instructive: you know what doesn’t work.  If it works really well, that’s instructive as well, but at the same time filmmakers say, don’t be tied into that.  Bring your own creative expression to that.  And of course I appreciate that, as most composers do.  That’s not always the case; some filmmakers tell you just do what’s there, and that’s a scenario that nobody likes.  When there’s no music, it’s almost the best situation, because then you’re free to do what you feel should be in the scene without any bias towards hearing something, getting used to the temp music.  It’s also pretty dangerous, because then you’re really taking a stab at it.  You don’t know what the filmmakers really intend for music.  So in that kind of scenario, when there’s nothing there, I would ask Lenore, what do you want the audience to feel?  I wouldn’t ask her what kind of music should it be.  Should it be guitars or strings?  I would never ask that.  I would ask what you want the audience to feel in the scene.  If there’s temp music there, I would play the scene without music.  And suggest entrances -- entrances and exits are incredibly important in music.   Because you may not want the audience to feel the music is coming in.  Just slowly creep it in.  Or you may want them to feel it coming in.  It takes a lot of skill and a lot of experience to get that right.  Same thing when the music goes away at the end of a scene.  So we would sit down and have lengthy discussions. 
With YELLOW ROCK we spent two or three seven-hour days going through the movie, because you can speak about one scene for an hour.  And if there are fifty scenes (that need) music, it can take many hours to go through.    After we’ve discussed the scenes, I start working on the music. I can away from the film and working on scenes, main title scenes and sub-scenes; it could be a theme that deals with a romantic angle, or a chase motif.  Sometimes I will just work on these themes or angles or motifs, away from the film, but with the film in mind.  Other times it’s write-to-picture.  It depends on the schedule.  If you have no time, sometimes you have to get right into working on a scene.  So however you decide to work on the music, you end up demo-ing – and when I say demo I mean synthesizers; the keyboard has any instrument you can play, to make a demonstration.   Recordings of what either the themes are, to play away from the picture, or actually score the scene, with music you’re writing for that specific moment.  You turn them in to the filmmakers; get some sense of if this is what they like.  And they may love it, they may hate it. 

HENRY:  Now speaking of synthesizing them, in lower budget films, it’s rare to have original scores these days.  I’ve come to expect a lot of synthesized music when you have one.  But your score is clearly ‘real’ and full orchestra.  How many people were involved in playing your music?

RANDY:  You’re right.  There was a full string section, which is maybe fifteen.  Which is actually not a full string section, but it’s good-sized.  Four wood-winds, two French horns, trumpet, trombone, a lot of guitar parts, many different kinds of guitars; everything from mandolas, mandolins, acoustic guitars, steel and nylon strings.  A lot of authentic Indian percussion, orchestral percussion, piano.

HENRY:  Speaking of Indian instruments, what were you using, to give the Indian feel to the music?

RANDY:  Mostly it was percussion and woodwinds.  And in the woodwind area we used native American wood flutes, which are transverse flutes, ones that go sideways, made of bamboo and wood.  We used ocarinas, which are South American woodland-type sounds.  Even things from India, real India, called a bansuri, but it kind of has a Native American sound.  In the percussion we used frame drums, which are the main instrument of many native cultures.  It’s basically a frame around a drum with a skin in the middle, in all kinds of sizes.  Wind chimes, shaker-type sounds, rattles.  Everything was acoustic, along with western-sounding instrument, which also blended nicely; like a concert bass drum, or tympanis.  I also used Japanese taiko drums, which is a giant drum with a frame around it.  It’s a great sound that blends in nicely with the real Native American sounds.  We went to great lengths, and the producers, Lenore and Steve, said your samples sound great, the percussion.  I said it would sound that much better if we replaced it with real percussion, and they went for it.  And my God, I’m so appreciative of that.  So we ended up replacing everything.  I don’t think there’s any synth; just a few little sound effects. 

HENRY:  You’ve worked on very large, and small, budget movies.  From a music point of view, what difference does the budget make – how do you approach them differently?

RANDY:  That’s a good question.  There’s no difference in the amount of effort I put in.  Because the score has to stand on its own, and be well-written and hopefully well received.  In smaller-budget films I tend to have to do everything myself, just because there’s no money.  Even in the case of YELLOW ROCK I ended up orchestrating everything, and I did have a copyist, which is great, but a lot of times I may have to do some copying myself -- copying of the music for the musicians.  So you’re time-crunched because the work-load is bigger, because you don’t have the funds to hire some support people, like other orchestrators or arrangers.  On the small-budget projects, if you know it’s heading right towards home-video, or even the TV, you can do all the work on synth, and you’re kind of writing that way; writing music that you know will sound pretty good on synth, or good enough.  On a bigger-budget project, if you think it’s going to go theatrical, you have to start thinking, how am I going to make this music sound right in a theatre?  How is it going to support a big space with several hundred people watching it at the same time? 

HENRY:  You’ve composed in a lot of genres.  You’ve done a lot of horror, a lot of comedy.  Do you have any particularly favorite scores that you look back on and think, that’s my best, or my favorite genre you like to work in?

RANDY MILLER:  Here’s the negative side.  I won’t say names, but there was a certain horror movie.  The first one had got some attention; on the second one they put a lot of money in, because they wanted to go theatrical.  And as is typical with sequels, you know how they really go over the top?  This one was really awful; it was just disgusting.  It was just spectacle for the sake of spectacle.  And it was not a pleasant experience for any kind of creative filmmaking, for me to watch this kind of filmmaking being done.  It was disgusting – and I like good horror films.  Scary films, like the original ALIEN; now that’s scary. 

HENRY:  There’s a huge difference between scary and revolting.

RANDY:  That’s a great word – this was revolting; and I’m proud of what I did with the music.  I think I did a really good score, it was well received.  But I felt like I would never want to work on another film that disgusting.  I felt like I was putting something out in the world that’s just so negative. 

HENRY:  And you have to watch it so many times. 

RANDY:   On the other extreme of that was AMARGOSA; Todd Robinson was the director of that, and it’s a beautiful film, beautifully shot; Kurt Apduhan the DP, got an Emmy for it.  Real positive, interesting story, and I was real proud of what I did on that.  And there were several like that, YELLOW ROCK included.  That had a lot to do with the genre, which was such a different combination.  SHANGHAI RED, another small film, dealing with issues in China. 

HENRY: Tell me, would you like to do another Western?

RANDY:  I’d love to.  Maybe one of your filmmaker friends out there will email me. 

HENRY:  As we jumped right into this interview, I don’t think I told you how much I enjoyed your score.  I think it’s terrific.  And because I collect western soundtracks, I’d heard so much.  Rarely do I hear something that I like, where it’s not derivative of Elmer Bernstein or Ennio Morricone.  But yours doesn’t sound like other people’s work.

RANDY:  Thank you, I really appreciate that.  And as you just mentioned, there’s a real strong history of excellent film composers doing great scores – and those are two of the best, that you mentioned.  Even to be in the same paragraph is quite a compliment – thank you for that. 

HENRY:  Who did you consider the great film composers, that we haven’t talked about?

RANDY:  Some of the original ones, going way way way back.  People like Max Steiner, with KING KONG: that was one of those scores that really affected me; oh my God, this is someone who’s done something from nothing.  He was fantastic – he did so many great scores.  Bernard Herrmann, all the amazing things he did with PSYCHO and JOURNEY TO THE CENTER OF THE EARTH.  I mentioned Jerry Goldsmith of course.  Most of the film composers of the golden age, back in the forties, they were all so good, they were classical composers.  Franz Waxman, that whole bunch that came over from Europe, during World War II and settled in Los Angeles.  These were serious concert composers, enormous talents.  Really an amazing period of time, because they were all so good.  Even people like Leonard Bernstein, who was American, but that whole period of time in the forties and fifties, there was unbelievable talent. 

HENRY:  Do you have any particularly favorite Western scores?

RANDY:  From the last twenty years, I’ve always been very fond of SILVERADO, by Bruce Broughton.  I think that score brought a resurgence for composers to go hey, this is a contemporary Western score.  It had nothing to do with a contemporary setting, it’s just that it was a composer writing in the ‘80s as compared to the ‘60s or ‘70s; his take on Westerns, and it’s a great score.  I know Bruce, and was always a big fan of his, and that score.  Tremendous, fantastic score.

HENRY:  Is there a major difference approaching a score, if the movie has not yet been shot, versus when you’re working with a rough cut?

RANDY:  That’s a really good question.  I’m not sure if it’s a really big difference, but it’s an interesting one.  On a big film that I worked on, an Oliver Stone film called HEAVEN AND EARTH, Kitaro, who is a recording artist, brought me in to work with him on the music; and he wrote 90% of the music, I wrote 10%.  But I worked on all the music.  Kitaro really was not a film composer at that time; he was a Japanese recording artist.  And Oliver was very smart; he got us together before the film was even put together – they were shooting a little bit, but there was nothing to look at.  And he gave us a year to write the score, instead of three weeks, which can happen.  He figured, let’s get these guys working on the music.  So Kitaro would write a theme, some kind of a motif. And I would take it and develop it into more of a film score; extend it, orchestrate it, and give it contours that a scene might need.  And we would send it to him, and he would comment – he likes this, he doesn’t like this – so eventually, when the film started coming in, we would take those pieces and start contouring them for the scene.  Sometimes we had to start from scratch, but other times they would just fit in.  It was nice because it gives you more freedom not to look at anything, to kind of use your imagination.  Oliver was a big fan of the usage of music in film.  He actually had Warner Brothers finance a huge recording session with us, probably a 100 piece orchestra -- that’s very rare -- just to experiment with themes.  You practically never hear of that.  They had nothing close to a final cut, and he just wanted to hear what these things would sound like in their biggest, fullest form.

HENRY:  I take it you liked working with Oliver Stone.

RANDY:  Yeah; well, he’s an interesting character, terribly smart, but when you sit down to work with him you have to follow his every thought process; he’s going from one thing to the next very quickly.  It could have to do with the film, it could have to do with his daily life, with his experiences in Vietnam, or anything – you just have to go with him.  He’s quite an amazing filmmaker.  Even when I’m working away from film, when I’m working on a record, or something that’s not visual, I find it kind of refreshing not to constantly sit there and look at something.  Closing your eyes and just doing music for music’s sake. 

HENRY: You know what Sergio Leone had Ennio Morricone do for THE GOOD, THE BAD AND THE UGLY?  He composed the score before they shot anything, and he played it on the set to pace the actors.

RANDY:  Boy, that’s a filmmaker who has a deep appreciation of music.  And what a great story!  What a great composer that he picked to do that with.  I didn’t know that.  Studios really do bring in composers way too late.  What we get paid, whether it’s a dollar or a hundred thousand dollars, we’re getting paid to do a job.  And sometimes we’re paid to do it in three weeks; we would be more than glad to get the same amount of money and have four months.  It would only make it all the better, but unfortunately post-production schedules are not structured that way.  It would be great if we could be hired months before, come up with some music – all composers would jump at the chance to do it that way.  Lenore brought me in as early as she could, which was really nice and early, and I was very pleased about that – she gave me time to complete the score, and do the best job I could.  As a matter of fact she pushed back some of the schedule to give me time. 

HENRY:  Is the YELLOW ROCK score you’re first soundtrack to be put out on CD?

RANDY:  No, I’ve had several.  Intrada.com, they’re the website that specializes in film scores, and they’ve released several others of my scores, including the one I mentioned, AMARGOSA. There was a miniseries called SPARTACUS – not the new one.  This was from Universal and high quality.  HELLRAISER 3 has come out; PIRATES OF THE PLAINS has come out.  THE SOONG SISTERS, a very big Chinese film, it won a lot of awards – the score won awards – that’s out as well.  That’s another score I did with Kitaro.  I’ve probably had ten CDs out.

HENRY:  It must be nice to know that people are sitting down to listen to your music, on purpose, and not just hearing it while watching the movie.

RANDY: I hope so; you always hope people feel that way.  Hopefully they do enjoy it away from the movie. 

To hear samples of music from Randy Miller’s YELLOW ROCK score, visit the Intrada Website HERE.
      

And here’s the trailer for YELLOW ROCK, which is available at Amazon.com and elsewhere.







[1] I’d told Randy that when I was 8 years old, I’d begged my parents to buy me the soundtrack from DR.NO.  The real reason I wanted it was for the pictures of Ursula Andress on the cover, but while ogling them, I listened to the music, and became hooked on movie soundtracks. 


CONFIRMATION ON JAMES FENIMORE COOPER’S HOME

If you read last week’s Round-up, you know that while back in New York City last week, I tried to find the home of the LAST OF THE MOHICANS author, and could not locate the plaque I had so often seen in the 1970s, at the St. Mark’s Baths.  I sent an inquiry to the James Fenimore Cooper Society, and have just received a response from Hugh MacDougall, Corresponding Secretary:

“You are quite correct. Cooper lived at 4 St. Marks Place (pictured in your attachment) for a time after his return from Europe in 1833. Specifically, he lived there from May 1, 1834 until May 1, 1836 (May 1 was the standard period for leases in New York to begin and end). He, and sometimes his family also, made a number of trips to Cooperstown during that period, as he arranged to buy back and remodel his old family home (Otsego Hall) originally built about 1800 by his father William Cooper.

“Below is a picture of the building from p. 272 of Mary Phillips, “James Fenimore Cooper” New York: John Lane, 1913. It is clearly the one you photographed.”

In 1913

A century later, in 2013


I’ll have to contact them again, to see if they know what happened to the plaque, and what its text said.


CINECON 49 OPENS THURSDAY



The 49th Annual Cinecon Classic Film Festival will open on Thursday, August 29th, with the first screening at 2 pm at the Grauman’s Egyptian Theatre.  They feature a wonderfully eclectic schedule of movies, with plenty of silent shorts and features, Our Gang comedies in French, musicals, comedies and dramas.  The special guest for this year’s festival is Shirley Jones.  Among the screenings of particular interest to Western fans is Friday’s 4:55 pm showing of RAMROD (1947), from Luke Short’s story, directed by Andre de Toth, and starring Joel McCrea and Veronica Lake.  And Sunday at 10:50 am it’s SUTTER’S GOLD (1936), about the 1849 discovery of gold in California, starring Edward Arnold as Sutter, with Lee Tracy and Binnie Barnes.  For details, visit the website HERE.


3-D EXPO KICKS OFF WITH 60TH ANNI. SCREENING OF ‘HONDO’



From September 6th through the 15th, the 2013 WORLD 3D FILM EXPO III will be held at the glorious Hollywood Egyptian Theatre.  The first movie to be screened will be the terrific HONDO, starring John Wayne, Geraldine Page (nominated for an Oscar) and Ward Bond, and directed by John Farrow.  The Duke’s daughter-in-law and Batjac Executive Gretchen Wayne will do a Q & A about the film’s preservation.    
On Friday, September 13th at 3:30 pm, WINGS OF THE HAWK, Budd Boeticcher’s western set against the Mexican Revolution, starring Van Heflin, Julie Adams and Noah Beery Jr. will screen, and Julie Adams will be present for a Q&A and book signing. 

Among the actors making personal appearances during the expo will be Piper Laurie, Lea Thompson, Louis Gossett Jr., and producer Walter Mirisch.  Go HERE for a complete schedule.


DON'T MISS THE 'LONGMIRE' SEASON FINALE ON MONDAY NIGHT!



Is it just me, or does it seem like season two had just started, and it's already finale time?  LONGMIRE, like HELL ON WHEELS, has a ten-episode season.  I was just checking the numbers on shows in the old golden days, for comparison purposes.  CHEYENNE only had fifteen episodes its first season, RAWHIDE had 22.  WAGON TRAIN had 39, which I think was the average, and THE REBEL only ran two seasons, but produced 76 episodes!  Not that I’m complaining – I just want more of a good thing! 


DEFENSE OF 'THE LONE RANGER' FROM ACROSS THE POND



Davy Turner is a British Round-up Rounder who keeps us up-to-date on what Westerns are playing on TV and in theatres in his country.  Having heard the complaints about THE LONE RANGER, when he finally got to see the movie, he filed the following report:

"WHAT the blazes were the US film critics moaning about!!! The Lone Ranger is EPIC...it contains, classic western scenarios, fabulous western settings (you can't beat Monument Valley....ask The Duke)...superb special effects, the work with the two railways is incredible...and the script is both serious and funny. Johnny is terrific and 'not' just another Cap'n Jack parody..Armie is playing the role fine in the Destry becomes tough role and the message about how the Native Americans were so poorly treated is also covered in the movie plot. The 'how' John Reid became 'The Lone Ranger' is almost original to the TV series...BUT...this film deserves to be seen by everyone...western fans and Johnny Depp aside...it's a great summer blockbuster movie with 'heart'.When the William Tell overture kicks in (the second 'real' time)..your heart just soars. Two thumbs up pardners  Thanks to my daughter Em for coming specially to take me ...the horses were enough for her I guess  (OK so the rabbits were a bit weird! )" 

Incidentally, when I shared his comments on Facebook, they were echoed by others in England, the U.S. and Germany.  It was a very enjoyable film.  It's a pity the critics had their knives out before they even saw it.

THE WRAP-UP

That's it for this week!  Next week I'll be telling you about the coming RAMONA DAYS celebration, and either book or DVD reviews -- depending on what I manage to finish!  Have a great week!

Happy Trails,

Henry

All Original Contents Copyright August 2013 by Henry C. Parke -- All Rights Reserved