THE HOMESMAN Press Conference
On Monday, November 10th, myself and at
least a dozen other press types were ushered into the 8th floor
ballroom of the Beverly Hilton to attend a press conference with HOMESMAN star
Hilary Swank, and star and writer and producer and director Tommy Lee Jones.
Also on hand were several members
of Swank’s family, including her proud father whom, Hilary told us, had neither
read the book nor seen the movie yet. We
all agreed not to give anything crucial away.
Well, with that many reporters, you never get to ask
all the questions you’d like, but most of the questions were interesting, and
the answers were revealing – as you’ll see.
Although I didn’t get to talk to him about it, Tommy Lee Jones is a very
accomplished director of Westerns, having helmed three – more than any other
Harvard man. In addition to THE
HOMESMAN, he directed the modern-day THE THREE BURIALS OF MELQUIADES ESTRADA
and the period THE GOOD OLD BOYS. With
GOOD OLD BOYS he co-wrote the teleplay with J.T. Allen, adapting the great
Elmer Kelton’s celebrated novel. It
earned a Best Supporting Actress Emmy nomination for Tommy Lee’s COAL MINER’S
DAUGHTER co-star Sissy Spacek. Similarly,
with THE HOMESMAN, Tommy Lee co-wrote the screenplay with Kieran Fitzgerald and
Wesley A. Oliver, adapting the classic novel by Glendon Swarthout.
Q: The cinematography that you and (cinematographer)
Rodrigo Prieto have created is a story unto itself. What were your considerations in the visual
design that you created?
TOMMY LEE: Well, it was a journey eastward, and the
destination had to look a lot different than the origin. And I got really tired of trying to figure out
how we were going to make Galisteo, New Mexico look like bosky woods. We thought of everything, and all manner of computer-generated
imaging, and phony trees, and it didn’t work.
And we were very lucky to find Lumpkin, Georgia, where a man with a considerable
amount of discretionary income tried to buy every 19th century home
in Georgia and Alabama. He made a little town. It was perfectly suited to our purposes – we
were very, very lucky to find that facility, because of the contrast between
Nebraska and Iowa. We wanted the end of
the journey to have a very different look and feel from the beginning of the journey. Pretty simple.
Q: How did you achieve the striking authenticity in
the look of Nebraska in the 1800s?
TOMMY LEE: The
first thing I should do is mention an itinerant photographer who traveled
around Nebraska in the mid 19th Century, making his living taking
photographs of people and their houses. He
had a motif usually; he had a pretty wide lens, and he would feature 100% of
the house, which is very useful to us in providing architectural details when
we began to build these houses ourselves.
And the people lead very isolated lives; photography was not a part of
their lives. If they had a chance to
have their picture taken, that was a big deal.
The whole family would get out in front of the house with their best
clothes on. And if they had a good crop
of watermelons that year, they’d put a table, put watermelons on the table and
cut one in half. If they had a piano or
a melodeon, they’d bring it out of the house and get that in the picture. Granddad would be in the middle, and they’d
all be there, posing with their guns – anything they were proud of. Wonderful record of costumes, hair, make-up –
very useful to us.
HILARY: I
just want to add that my aunt, who is sitting right behind (the reporter), and
my family over here, they’re from Iowa.
I was born in Nebraska; I come from a generation of farmers, too. My dad gave me accounts of our history, where
our family goes to the early 1700s in Iowa, and there is one account that is
shockingly similar to the story (of THE HOMESMAN), but I only read it three
days ago, that my jaw dropped. And I
just thought – wow! (To Tommy Lee) I
couldn’t wait to tell you that. One of the
things was, Indians shot one of my ancestors, John Swank, nineteen times, but
he was against a rock, and he stayed upright, and they fled because they
thought he was a spirit, because he didn’t fall over.
DUMB Q: But he was dead, right?
HILARY: No,
he was a spirit. And he’s in this room
right now.
Q: Hilary, you’re playing a character with so many
layers of emotion, and you’re both showcasing them and holding them back. What toll does it take on you, physically and
emotionally to play such a character?
HILARY: The things that Mary Bee was working through
are not dissimilar to what we all work through in our lives. We all struggle to find how to be the best
people we can be, and try to find love along the way. And that’s why to me it’s not just a period
piece; it really parallels everyday life for a lot of people. And I relish the opportunity that I get to
play these real slices of life, because even though it’s not based on a true
story, in a lot of ways, as I was talking about in my account of my family’s
history, it is real life stuff, and getting to do it alongside someone as esteemed
as Tommy Lee, who has been doing it for so long, is such an honor as an
artist. To me, Mary Bee is a woman who
has manners and morals and values, and she wants to do the right thing for the
sake of doing the right thing. And we,
in my opinion, have really lost touch with that as a society today. So there’s so many reasons why I love her,
and so many reasons why I relate to her.
Because, I’m an independent woman myself, who people would probably call
bossy. I have a real clear idea of how I
see the world, and how I want to live, and I want to see my dreams realized; I
want to continue down my path. And so finding
a man to walk shoulder to shoulder with me can be challenging. I think women today have that challenge. There’s a lot of reasons why I love her, and
love the vulnerability of her.
Q: Hilary, can you talk about working with Tommy Lee
as an actor, and working with him as a director?
HILARY: I’m
not just saying it because he’s here, but he truly is extraordinary. Tommy Lee, he comes alive in a different way
when he’s in that element of doing what he loves. With me it’s hard enough just figuring out my
character, let alone wearing all the hats he wore as the co-writer and the
director and the actor -- being at helm of all of those thing. I have to tell you that I didn’t want this to
be over. I wanted it to continue going on. TV’s not my medium, only because I like to
play a character and let it go, and find the next character. But if
this could have gone into TV series I’d have been really happy. Because I really enjoyed it in every level as
an artist, and all the things I was able to sponge up from this veteran, being
under his guidance. Also when your director
is also acting with you, there’s a shorthand; he knows how to say something in
a few words, to get his point across.
Q: I am Japanese, and in Japan, everyone knows you
as ‘Alien Jones’. (Note: Tommy Lee Jones
has for some years starred in a very popular series of commercials for a canned
coffee drink called BOSS, from Suntory.
He plays an extraterrestrial studying Earth and humans, and is usually
baffled or disappointed by everything he finds except for BOSS. This link will take you to a ton of the ads on Youtube: http://youtu.be/39MILG4txBk ) You are
really funny in that TV ad, but in movies, you are kind of grumpy-ish. Which is
the real you?
TOMMY LEE: I’m not sure that I understand your
question. You’re asking about a
dichotomy that I don’t see. I really
love doing those commercials in Japan.
I’m leaving in three weeks to make some new ones. It’s the most successful campaign in the
history of Japanese advertising.
HILARY: (Clarifying the reporter’s question) Is it
easier to be funny in those, or serious in your movies?
Q: (To Hilary) Thank you for translating.
TOMMY LEE: I
don’t know; comedy is deadly serious business.
It’s scary. I love being an
actor; I’m always happy to have a job.
HILARY: I
think what’s great is that he can do both.
Because when people talk to me about Tommy Lee, they say, ‘He’s so serious
and intense.’ Yet, maybe that’s what he wants to portray at that moment; you
don’t have to show all the facets of yourself at one time. And that’s the great thing about being an
actor; you get to share all the different sides we have in us. But I don’t think everyone can show all those
sides, so it bespeaks of his talent that he can show all those sides and do it
so well.
TOMMY LEE: Hilary, I want you to go with me for the
rest of this –
HILARY: (agreeing) Deal!
TOMMY LEE:
Deal. Because only you can both
ask and then answer the questions. I’m
sticking with you.
Q: Mr. Jones, how do you feel your experience as an
actor prepared you to be a filmmaker, and how does it inform your work as a
director and a writer. And what did you
learn from your last experience as a director that you were able to bring onto
this film?
TOMMY LEE: (to Hilary) What did he say? (after the
laugh) My education as a filmmaker has been entirely practical. I started working professionally in the film
business in 1970. And I’ve been at it
steadily since; and I’ve paid a lot of attention. I’ve worked with some very good directors,
and some very bad ones, and I’ve learned a great deal from both. From the bad, untalented people, you learn
what not to do. And when you work with
highly talented people, you want to emulate them. So as I said, my education has been
practical, or on-the-job training. And
every day is a bigger, broader, brighter day than the day before.
Q: And did
you learn anything from the last film that you directed.
TOMMY LEE: It
gets easier to budget my time, hour by hour.
I suppose that’s a learning process.
HILARY: You
learned not to give me a horse between takes because –
TOMMY LEE: Because you’ll leave!
HILARY: They
started with a horse-wrangler, but he became a Hilary wrangler.
TOMMY LEE: I
don’t want to talk about you as if you’re not here. She didn’t know a lot about riding horses or
driving a team of mules, or plowing with a double-shovel. She worked at it until she could make a very
convincing picture of all of those. And
between takes, or when we did a turn-around – shooting this way, and then it
takes a little while to turn the camera and look the other way –
HILARY: -- I
was like Yee-haw!
TOMMY LEE: It
got so I had to send a wrangler with a radio on his belt, to make sure she
didn’t fall off in an arroyo somewhere, or have a wreck, or not know when to
come back.
Q: So you learned to keep Hilary Swank on a short
leash?
TOMMY LEE: No, I turned her completely loose, but I
sent somebody with a radio.
Q: Hilary, your character has such a defining moment
– I know your father hasn’t seen it yet, so no spoilers – but I wonder, when
you read the script, did that change your opinion of her, and how you played
her?
HILARY: It
made me realize just how truly human she was, and how vulnerable. I say she goes where angels fear to
tread. And with all these valiant
attributes to her, there’s still that underlying need for love, and she’s
human. And it made me realize I loved
her all the more, not because of the choice she made, but because it’s
relatable.
Q: There were
several scenes where Hilary sang. Did
you know that she sang, and was that a factor in her casting – (to Hilary) –
because you sing so beautifully.
TOMMY LEE:
No. The important thing is Mary
Bee’s loneliness, and her hunger for some kind of culture. There’s a very telling moment in the early
part of the movie, when she’s playing this scenes so beautifully with John
Lithgow. She looks out the window
through this beautiful light, and in this abstracted way says, “I don’t think I
can live much longer without real music.”
And that becomes telling. That’s
more important -- we didn’t have any musical auditions. The important thing was Hilary’s sensitivity
to Mary Bee’s character.
Q: Hilary, you were singing live for all those
shots.
HILARY: Tommy
Lee didn’t want to cut a lot. He said
‘I’m not going to cut around this. I’ll
do two different set-ups of this, but I really want it all in one.’ I take great pride in the opportunities I
get, and I didn’t want to let him down.
So I tried my hardest, but I didn’t know how I was going to sound like.
TOMMY LEE: I
think you sang that song six times, to get that scene. The essential thing about that scene was a
dolly track that moved 180 degrees from this profile, to head-on, to that
profile. We did that in two different
sizes, medium and close, going in both directions. What saved us from editing was thorough
shooting. Originally there were three
verses to that song, but the movie doesn’t have time to stop and listen to all
three of them. So it was edited to one third
of its length, one verse and part of a chorus.
It’s a beautiful scene. But what
makes it work is that 180 degree dolly track.
The camera’s always moving; there’s always something happening. As the camera moves, the candle gets behind
her head and backlights her hair beautifully.
You can’t take your eyes off of her in that scene.
Q: What were the elements of the story that
motivated you to devote so much creativity and time to making this happen? And how easy was it to zoom in on Hilary as
the right actress to play this role?
TOMMY LEE: There’s two questions. The answer to the first one is that the book
offered us the chance to make a screenplay with some originality to it. And of course, our lives as filmmakers are a
never-ending search for originality, desperately crawling for originality. Not always readily available. We worried about Hilary for probably two or
three seconds. We met, and it was
immediately obvious to me and to Michael Fitzgerald that Hilary was absolutely
perfect. Of course I had seen all of her
films before meeting her. But I knew immediately
that if we could talk her into playing Mary Bee Cuddy, half of our job would be
done.
HILARY: I actually read the script and emailed Tommy
Lee, and he sat down with me. So there
was no talking me into it.
Q: Is it a
whole different challenge to you to direct the actors and actresses who do a
whole lot of talking, and the three actresses who do practically no talking at
all?
TOMMY LEE: No
sir. Talking is just one of the things
that actors do. Movement is another
one. There are a lot of moving parts to
the job of acting. But really, directing
someone who doesn’t talk as opposed to someone who does; not a lot of
difference. What you want is to get the
feelings right. Sometimes words
help. Sometimes they don’t.
HILARY: Most of the time you’re trying to figure out
what’s happening between the lines, because that’s really the reality, other
than what you’re saying.
MILES SWARTHOUT INTERVIEW
This interview took place before an eager audience
during this April’s Santa Clarita Cowboy
Festival, at Melody Ranch, at the huge OutWest
Buckaroo Bookstore (run by the same fine folks whose ad and link are found
at the top of this page!).
HENRY: It gives me great pleasure to introduce Miles
Swarthout, a very talented author whose writing about 90% of you have
appreciated, even though you haven’t read it.
Because he’s a screenwriter. This
is the man who wrote the screenplay for THE SHOOTIST, John Wayne’s final film,
and one of his finest. And in scripting
THE SHOOTIST, he had the rare challenge not only of adapting a great novel, but
a great novel that his own father, Glendon Swarthout, had written. Glendon wrote sixteen novels, and several
became movies, including 7TH CAVALRY, starring Randolph Scott; THEY
CAME TO CORDURA, starring Gary Cooper; BLESS THE BEASTS AND CHILDREN, WHERE THE
BOYS ARE, and premiering this May at the Cannes Film Festival, THE HOMESMAN,
directed by and starring Tommy Lee Jones, and starring Hilary Swank and Meryl
Streep. Welcome, Miles. Can you tell us a little about THE HOMESMAN?
MILES: THE HOMESMAN was a novel that my dad wrote,
and came out in 1988. That year it swept
the Western genre awards, winning The Wrangler Award, from the Western Heritage Association, affiliated
with the National Cowboy Hall of Fame
in Oklahoma City, and the WWA Spur Award for
the Best Western Novel of 1988. Paul
Newman was the original director who bought the film rights to THE
HOMESMAN. I worked on the original
drafts, adaptations for Paul Newman. But
Paul jumped around studios; the Writer Guild Strike intervened in 1988 for
about six months, and several other screenwriters later on got attached to the
project doing different drafts. Paul
became too old to play the title role any more, as the rugged frontiersman, and
had different stars attached to play the lead role. It just didn’t happen. He sold the rights back to SONY
PICTURES/COLUMBIA, when he had Bruce Willis attached to play the homesman, but
it fell into what’s called ‘development Hell.’
Nothing happened to it for a number of years – they couldn’t get it
financed. Paul Newman died of cancer a
few years after that. But Tommy Lee
Jones was looking around to direct and star in another Western, and he had the
same talent agency (as Paul Newman), Creative Artists, that remembered this
book that Paul Newman had tried a number of times to get made with different
stars. Tommy got the financing from his buddy,
the French director Luc Besson, who has his own films studio outside of Paris,
and his own film distribution company. Luc
also financed Tommy Lee’s last western that he directed in 2005, THE THREE
BURIALS OF MELQUIADES ESTRADA. That was
a contemporary western shot down in Texas.
That won a couple of awards at Cannes in 2005. Creative
Artists helped Tommy put together the cast for THE HOMESMAN. It’s fantastic: Hilary Swank, the two-time
Oscar winner is Tommy’s co-star. Tommy
Lee Jones is an Oscar winner for THE FUGITIVE with Harrison Ford, Best
Supporting Actor. And they’ve got Meryl Streep
in the movie – she’s got a cameo role.
And Streep’s youngest daughter, her name is Grace Gummer; she has a
bigger part in the film. John Lithgow, two-time
Oscar nominee is in it. James Spader,
who’s in the NBC hit THE BLACK LIST is in the film. They’ve got an Oscar-nominated
cinematographer, and a two-time Oscar-nominated composer, Marco Beltrami, has
done the music.
HENRY:
Speaking of the cast, I understand that Barry Corbin is in the
film. Hasn’t he worked with Tommy Lee
Jones before?
MILES: He was in NO COUNTRY FOR OLD MEN, playing
Tommy Lee’s father in that.
HENRY: The
premise of THE HOMESMAN is a little outrageous.
Could you give us a summary of it?
MILES: The
Homesman is a claim jumper. It’s set in
the 1850s, the Great Plains state of Nebraska.
He’s a claim jumper, and some of the local residents take offense that
he’s sitting on one of their buddy’s claims, while their buddy has gone back
east to find a wife. They blast him out
of this sod home that he’s roosting in, and almost hang him, and a spinster
woman, Hilary Swank, comes along. She
decides to let him go, because she’s just been chosen by a lottery system by
the community, in this small frontier farming town on the Great Plains, to
drive back east four women who have gone insane after this very hard
winter. They’ve gone crazy, and they
can’t take care of them in this remote area, so someone has to drive them
across the Missouri River, the Big Muddy, and back to civilization.
HENRY: Have you run into any complaints about sexism
– why do the women go crazy, and not the men?
MILES: Historically some of the men went crazy,
too. They became raving alcoholics; they
couldn’t keep them in the local jails.
If they were disruptive and making people angry or uncomfortable,
somebody’d just shoot them, but they wouldn’t do that to a woman. This is a very unusual story, a female-oriented
Western, a mismatched couple running this wagon east with some women who have
gone insane.
HENRY: Let’s talk about THE SHOOTIST. What was it like to adapt a novel to a
screenplay with a man, not just the author, but your father, looking over your
shoulder?
MILES: Well, that was my first screenplay
adaptation, and you’re talking with the creative genius who made up the story
in the first place, so he’s got a lot of good input. My dad did not write screenplays. He worked on the very first one for six
months at Columbia Pictures, his
best-selling novel, THEY CAME TO CORDURA.
He was out in Hollywood, and he got job offers after that, to work for
Burt Lancaster’s company Hecht, Hill and
Lancaster, but he turned them down.
He said no, I’m going back to Michigan State in East Lansing, to teach
honors English. And I’m going to write
other books, and I don’t want people telling me how to make changes and how to
write stuff. So he gambled, and that
turned out very well for him. His second
novel was WHERE THE BOYS ARE, 1960, and it was a big hit for MGM, with Connie
Francis singing the theme. But your
question was about adapting THE SHOOTIST.
And of course I showed him drafts, and we discussed stuff. I did get a screen credit on that. They did make a lot of changes. Don Siegel, the director, had another writer
that he’d worked with before, a guy named Scott Hale, who was making changes on
the set constantly, for Jimmy Stewart and John Wayne, and big stars with big
egos who wanted things adjusted and changed.
So he wrote just enough of the rewritten script to get screen credit on
the film. But luckily, it turned out, even
though it was a very difficult shoot, in Carson City, Nebraska, and on the
backlot at Warner Brothers Studio in Burbank.
They had a lot of problems; Wayne came down with the flu and an ear
infection. And he was in the hospital for
a couple of weeks. They shut down
filming, and he came back and got sick again, and they put him back in the
hospital. They didn’t know if he was
going to live, and if they could even finish the movie. So a lot of stuff had to be adjusted. It was the last film he ever made. His health deteriorated after that, and about
two years later, John Wayne died. But
the movie, even though he was feuding all the time of the filming with this
tough director, Don Siegel, turned out very well. They had a great supporting cast. John Wayne was playing a gunfighter who was
dying of cancer in the film. It was prostate
cancer in the film. But Wayne had lost
one lung a couple of years ago to lung cancer, and he knew at the time of
shooting THE SHOOTIST that his cancer had come out of remission, and he didn’t
tell the doctors and he didn’t tell the filmmakers. So he was obviously in some pain while making
this movie. He’s playing a gunfighter
dying of cancer, and he’s got cancer at the same time: talk about a movie that
was hand-tailored for a famous actor as his last film. It just turned out very well.
HENRY: It
certainly did. As you said, your father
did not write for the screen, but by the time he wrote THE SHOOTIST, he was
well aware that he had a real good chance of having his novels filmed. He’d had several movies already done very
successfully. Do you think he had a
movie in mind as he was writing the book?
Do you think he thought of John Wayne?
MILES: No, he
didn’t think of John Wayne. The original
guy that the two producers, Bill Self and Mike Frankovich wanted to play the
Shootist, was George C. Scott. And George
C. Scott read the book and screenplay and said, “I’d love to do this. Don’t change one word of the script.” We thought that sounds great. But the producers took it around to all the
studios with George C. Scott attached as the shootist. And all the studios went, ‘No, General Patton
can’t be a cowboy.’ He’d already won his
Oscar playing Patton, and they wouldn’t bankroll it. But Wayne at the same time had heard about this
story, and he started lobbying for the role, because he was the right age, and
with Wayne attached as the shootist, they got half of the eight million dollar
budget from Paramount Pictures, for the North American rights. And they got the other half of the money from
the famous Italian producer Dino de Laurentiis.
He made that big monkey movie with Jessica Lange – KING KONG, and a
whole bunch of other movie. Dino didn’t
speak English very well, so he couldn’t read it; they had to tell him the
story. And he said, “John Wayne,
cowboy? Ya, he be good.” The Duke was cast, and then a whole bunch of
really good ‘name’ supporting actors – Jimmy Stewart, Lauren Bacall, Ron
Howard, Hugh O’Brien, all worked at lower than their normal salaries to be in
this, because word had gotten around that Wayne’s health was pretty shaky, and
it might be his last picture. Hollywood
supports its own – particularly its legends like John Wayne. So that’s how they got a great cast, and the
rest is film history. It’s now considered to be one of his five best
Westerns. It’s past the test of
time.
HENRY: I was
just reading where Harry Carey Jr. was saying that while John Wayne got his
Oscar for TRUE GRIT, and deserved it, he deserved it even more for THE
SHOOTIST.
‘THE SHOOTIST’ SPOILER ALERT!
HENRY: The book is a very tight 158 pages, but
still, no book reaches the screen without edits. What sort of changes needed to be made, to
make it into a movie?
MILES: You
have to cut out some of the characters. You
have to trim it to get about a 120 page script – about a page a minutes. The ending of the novel is different than the
ending of the movie. John Wayne dictated
the ending of the movie, and there was a lot of controversy over this. In the ending of the movie, John Wayne has
this big shootout in this fancy saloon.
And he shoots Hugh O’Brien, and he shoots Richard Boone – who was a late
addition. That was a different character
than the character in the book. And John
Wayne, after shooting these guys, and being wounded, and already knowing he’s
dying of cancer – sort of committing suicide – the bartender comes out with a
shotgun and shoots him – blows him in the back.
So he’s dying, when Ron Howard comes into the saloon, the bartender is
reloading. Ron takes Wayne’s Remington .44,
and shoots the bartender, and kills the guy who shot John Wayne. And then, as dictated by the Duke, Ron throws
the gun away. This is a kid, the Shootist
is his hero, and he wants to be a gunfighter, too. But now that he’s killed a man, he throws the
gun away, renounces violence, and goes home with his mother, played by Lauren
Bacall. The problem with this ending is
there’s no possible sequel. Hollywood
loves sequels. In the book, John Wayne
is dying. The kid doesn’t shoot the
bartender, but John Wayne asks Ron Howard to kill him, ‘Finish me off.’ And the Ron Howard character says ‘okay,’ and
he shoots him – it’s a mercy killing, and Wayne asked for it. And they had already made a deal in advance
that Ron gets his two Remington .44 pistols.
He takes them, and walks outside of the saloon – it’s a great ending passage. And people are asking if they can buy the
guns, and what happened in there. The
Shootist has killed all the hard-cases in El Paso, and suddenly, the kid is the
one who killed The Shootist. And that’s
the sequel –
HENRY: If I ever heard one! Somebody should write it!
MILES: (laugh)
My new novel is called THE LAST SHOOTIST, and it’s coming out in October from
Forge Books-MacMillan in New York City. And it’s the next six months in this kid’s
life. The Shootist is dead, but this kid
has got John Wayne’s matched pistols, and he’s got to flee 1901 El Paso, because
the sheriff is after him. The sheriff
wants those guns because they’re very valuable.
The kid’s on the run, and he goes through various adventures in New
Mexico with a wannabe novelist, and then on to Bisbee, Arizona, which was a
copper-mining boom-town at that time.
The character of the Shootist, my dad loosely based on John Wesley Hardin,
who killed 44 men, and was a real gun-spinner.
Hardin in real life had a special vest made up with leather pockets, so
that he could cross-draw his guns. They
tried to do that for John Wayne in the movie, made a special vest for him, but
Wayne was overweight and too big, and couldn’t get the guns out easily from under
his overcoat, so they had to go back to the six-guns in holsters on his waist. But
I’ve changed that in my sequel. The kid
is eighteen years old and has terrific hand-eye coordination, and he is the
last Shootist. If you like the original,
hopefully you’ll like my sequel.
HENRY: Speaking of your novels, I notice you have
another, THE SERGEANT’S LADY.
MILES: That
was my first novel. That was based on an
extension of one of my dad’s short stories for the old Saturday Evening Post, and
that won a Spur back in 2004 as the Best First Western Novel of the Year, from
the Western Writers of America.
THE LAST SHOOTIST is now available, and if you’d
like a preview, go HERE, to Miles Swarthout’s site, where you can read the end
of THE SHOOTIST and the start of THE LAST SHOOTIST.
WED. COWBOY LUNCH A TRIBUTE TO AUDIE MURPHY AT THE
AUTRY!
Every third Wednesday of the month, Rob Word
presents ‘A Word on Westerns’ at the café at the Autry. A delicious repast will be followed by a discussion
of the most decorated American soldier of the Second World War, who went on to
be a popular Western movie star. I don’t
know who the guests will be, but Rob always gets great speakers. It’s a free event, but you buy your own
lunch, and it always is packed, so if
you want a seat inside, get there early!
Lunch is officially at 12:30.
Enjoy!
HAPPY BIRTHDAY CLU GULAGER!
Happy 86th birthday to the great Clu
Gulager, who most of us Rounders remember best as Sheriff Emmett Ryker on THE VIRGINIAN,
but who also starred as Billy the Kid on THE TALL MAN, and in dozens of movies
and TV episodes in all imaginable genres. I particularly enjoy him in THE LAST PICTURE
SHOW, and in THE KILLERS, where he matter-of-factly introduces himself and
partner Lee Marvin to Angie Dickinson, while Lee Marvin is shoving her out of a
window. As a Cherokee, and as a working
cowboy before he became an actor, he brings an authenticity to Western roles as
few actors can. He’s also one of the
most interesting, entertaining and insightful people I’ve ever had the pleasure
of talking to.
GLEN A. LARSON DIES – CREATED ‘ALIAS SMITH AND JONES’
Peter Duel and Ben Murphy
Writer, producer and composer Glen A. Larson is best
remembered for series he created in the 1980s, including KNIGHT RIDER, BATTLESTAR
GALACTICA, and MAGNUM P.I., but in 1971 he created the Western adventure comedy
ALIAS SMITH AND JONES. Starring Peter
Duel as Hannibal Heyes and Ben Murphy as Kid Curry, notorious train-robbers,
they were offered pardons if they could keep their noses clean for a year, and they
adopted Smith and Jones as cover names.
THAT’S A WRAP!
‘HELL ON WHEELS’ SPOILER ALERT!
Kasha Kropinski as Ruth
Hey, I didn’t mention that HELL ON WHEELS has been
renewed for one last season, and will be jumping to fourteen episodes, one more
than this year, and four more than all the others. Last night’s show was excellent, but I’m a
bit heart-broken at losing Ruth. We all
know she should have ended up with Cullen, but I guess we’re lucky she lasted
this long. I remember my sister and I as
kids watching BONANZA or THE BIG VALLEY.
If any of the sons got serious with a woman, we’d place bets on whether
she was a con-woman, or if she’d be dead by the end of the hour – it was always
one or the other. But losing Ruth and
Elam in one season is pretty cruel. Have
a great week anyway!
Happy Trails,
Henry
All Original Contents Copyright November 2014 by
Henry C. Parke – All Rights Reserved
